One person, one plot of land, one harvest a year. Income and consumption do not happen at the same time, so there is saving. A second person arrives, so there is lending. A loan may not be repaid, so there are commitments. As people multiply, money appears. Harvests are uncertain, so there is insurance. Savers want to withdraw at any time while borrowers want to use the funds for a long time, so there are banks. No single person can afford a ship, so there are shares. Shares must be saleable, so there are markets. Prices gather everyone's information. Ordinary people have neither the time nor the expertise, so there is delegation. Trustees may not do their duty, so there are custody, disclosure and regulation. Even with all these institutions in place, people still make mistakes, so there are defaults. Twelve constraints grow the skeleton of today's financial system.
Each institution exists to solve a problem left by the one before, and each creates a new one. Arranged in logical order, the twelve institutions form a chain.
The world derived in these twelve steps is today's financial system. The problems of time, risk and information are shared out through saving, insurance and markets. Ordinary people hand their money to a few professional institutions, then constrain those institutions through custody, disclosure and suitability, and constrain themselves through defaults. Every institution makes claims on the future more accessible, more credible or cheaper, and every one carries a cost. A large part of that cost is the cost of having others think, act and check on one's behalf.
This cost explains many of today's arrangements: why only people with enough assets can afford an adviser, why a principal can see only a manager's past performance, why defaults can only be designed for the circumstances of the majority. If this cost fell sharply, some institutions would change and some would not. The problems of time, risk and maturity would remain; the ways of delegating, checking and sticking to a plan might be entirely different.
The order of the derivation is a logical order: each step presupposes the one before. The order in which the principles were proposed is a historical order, and the two often disagree. Many institutions grew up in practice first; only decades or even more than a century later did someone explain why they were necessary and under what premises they hold.